October 5th - Richard Orjis

This week Richard Orjis talked to us about his art practice which I really enjoyed because he specialised in photography. He mentioned in the lecture that he was drawn to fashion photography which is obvious as soon as you look at his work. Beauty is one of his main themes which relates really well to fashion, he uses bright vivid colours to create a glamorous effect or even to just emphasis the beauty that already exists in the objects he uses. Nature is also a motif in his work. With this he actually plays with beauty, his images juxtapose looking pretty and innocent while also looking dark and dangerous. Lastly he uses a lot of symbolism, these 3 key words tie together really nicely when you're looking at his work.

Basically he creates worlds for himself based on nature, influenced by the botanical. He has stated that "nature can be seen as beautiful and pure, and intrinsically good, but also dangerous and destructive, a spectacle of the devourers and the devoured" (www.thephysicsroom.org.nz/gallery/2008/orjis/) which talks about showing the two sides to nature's aesthetic and more symbolically about anxieties around sex and death. Pitcher plants and orchids appear to repeat as phallic and vulval forms, giving the works a humanistic and erotic quality. Darwin's theory of survival of the fittest is so appropriate because of flowers attracting pollinators, the prettiest flower will get pollinated versus our human need to attract mates. Orjis also mentioned in the lecture how flowers can be safe and beautiful but can represent sex and decay, like the strange thing about lovers giving each other flowers then having to watch them die.

The beauty of the flowers draws the viewer closer, and also closer to the mysterious, pitch black void. In a way it is quite cut throat, as if the flowers are enticing you in like prey. Beauty as a device.

The figures in his works are covered in mud or soot or coal as if blurring the line between nature and man. They stare out at the camera surrounded by brightly coloured flowers, emerging from the darkness. They appear as if they are part of some type of ritual, symbolically ceremonial which actually enters the work into a religious state which Orjis actually chooses to focus on aswell. What I really like about these images with the figures in them though are the technical quality. They are very complex in construction, he actually photoshops things like the orchids so they ironically don't become natural but rather resemble humanity like the human face or a closer detail. This could also be a reference to genetic mutation. I also like how he tends to alter the eyes of the subjects by exaggerating the whites of the eyes and the irises, it gives them an otherworldly presence and in a way preserves them. Obviously the most successful aspects technically would be the composition and the actual scale of the pieces, and the overall aesthetic.

Orjis really interested me with the materials he uses, he did a series of portraits drawn with mud. Again it's about being natural but they present beauty in unexpected materials. He told us in his lecture that he really liked Salvador Dali, I understand this because he works alot with opposites but in my opinion the word that springs to mind when I think about Dali is surreal rather than fantasy which is what I think of with Orjis.

I don't know who is responsible for this image but I found it awhile ago, it reminds me of Orjis' work in that it twists ideology surrounding nature and the human body. Like Orjis' Floros (top photo) it looks like some kind of tribute to a god of nature. Or it could just be from someone messing around on photoshop...

September 28th - Steve Rood

This week Steve Rood talked to us about his practice in photography, he mentioned he worked in different aspects of photography like documentary, fashion, advertising, and still life. I actually quite enjoyed this lecture, Rood was pretty funny with how he uses a mini fire extinguisher as his card with the story about his first photograph on the back of it so no one will forget him and no one will throw it away. I do wish though that he would have incorporated this kind of humour into his work because it would have been great to see combined with his amazing technical photography skills.

What started his interest in photography and likely his interest in the history of photography was what he experienced when he took his first photograph. The subject was a compost heap which after he took the photo of, later that day actually, it burst into flames and the fire brigade came to put it out. So he became interested in what photography can do as a medium and taking photos to see what would happen next.

I was really interested in his approach to fashion photography. He showed us images he took that were over exposed and out of focus which you would think would just be wrong but they really worked. This also continued as a theme for him.

The figures in these images look kind of ethereal which I think is an attractive element in the fashion industry, it speaks about this divine image women should strive for, fashion as a commodity. The image on the right, to me at least, looks like an exaggeration of women's desire to be thin and the lengths they go to, to achieve it. They look alien and distorted, tortured, but I like how they still manage to look beautiful and serene - like a swan's strange beauty.

It was actually kind of hard for me to understand his ideology because he has so many influences, but I found myself really interested in his photography for advertising. In the lecture he said that when he is considering fashion photography he tries to "romance the designer" so in these images a way that he does this is to leave lots of space for text, basically where ever it is white. This is a really clever idea for advertising, they would be perfect for magazine covers.

He did lots of work for advertising particularly in food, and from this he became the person you would call if you wanted a 'pour shot' (right photo). His goal would be to photograph food with a element of action, and this became what he specialised in but he assured us that once this happens an artist doesn't have to restrict themselves to that area of art which is very apparent in his overall work.

I really really really love his extreme close up shots that show great detail, it is a mode of photography I would love to ace just as he has. The textures and colours and moods of the images are more than just aesthetically pleasing. In my opinion images like these should not be used for computer screen savers, they deserve better than that.

For our photography brief I actually took close up photos as close as I could go and in a way that sort of reflected other artists I had seen so I was really pleased to see that rood worked with this.

This is my photo:

What I'm really disappointed about is that my work takes a lot of photo shop while Rood's great technical skills allow him to keep his images realistic in terms of colour etc, and also the texture is really strong and detailed.

From his website I saw that one of Rood's influences was Lou Reed which I thought was really appropriate because of the work Stefan Sagmeister made for his album. The close up image of his face is similar to Rood's images, the detail is great and the expression is key. I like how the lyrics on his face add to the emotion that is there, represent what the album is about. What I love about this however is that Rood's work doesn't seem to need any help with expressing emotion.

And finally I'm really glad that Harold Edgerton is one of Rood's influences, it obviously shows, especially when he talked about food and action. This image is pretty much the image for that idea. The technical side also relates to Rood in that it is perfect.

21st September - Fran Allison

Fran Allison trained as a jeweller but what she talked to us about in her lecture was the difference between collaboration and a collective. Basically a collaboration is a group of people working together on an artwork or project and when the work is resolved, authorship belongs to the group as a whole. A collective is more like a group of artists who work in similar concepts or the same space but make their own work individually. Allison raised the issue of a collaborative atmosphere which I found really interesting, how each person has their own ideas and interpretations but they have to fit and be agreed on by the others involved. For example you might have this idea that you really love and want to use but your collaborators might not like it and that would make continuance quite difficult. There is also this issue of authorship, like if a group's work involves audience interaction does that mean every audience member involved claims a share to ownership of the work?

Collaborating doesn't have to be like this of coarse, in a lot of situations it can be about getting help from other artists who have specialties in certain areas that you don't. A successful example of this is Cantilever, a mixed media by Deborah Crowe and Eldon Booth (one is trained as a weaver and one works in moving image).

Allison showed us a lot of groups and I really liked Unnatural/Naturally (Lauren Simeoni & Melinda Young) whose work explores ideas of botany and the body, also finding natural in the unnatural or unnatural in the natural and exploiting and utilising it.

Melinda Young, Fungal, Brooch, 2009, Pink Tourmaline, Artificial Plant Foliage, Marine Ply, 925 Silver, Acrylic Paint.

(www.dhub.org/articles/1233)

This work is an example of a collective as it is Melinda Young's individual work rather than a work made by both artists together.

One of the most famous collaborative groups is the Guerrilla Girls because they assumed the names of dead women artists and wore gorrilla masks in public. Their work uses provocative text, visuals and humour in the service of feminism and social change. They are pretty much the perfect example of collaborative art practice. From their website http://www.guerrillagirls.com/: Fighting discrimination with facts, humour and fake fur which I think is pretty much their approach to making in a nutshell.

The group Allison is a part of is called Weeds, the other members include Andrea Daly, Shelley Norton and Lisa Walker. After Bone. Stone. Shell allowed belief that these are the materials and this is the culture of New Zealand jewellery, Allison got together with these artists to change this view. They want to represent ALL the cultures NZ has today and they do that by working with all kinds of materials. Most of their work involves material exploration around domesticity. "For me, 'Weeds' is a platform for experimentation. Each 'weed' is different from the one before, and each could be cultivated into a body of work. Each piece is a new beginning, an exploration into new materials sourced from the domestic urban environment. The pieces explore the decorative possibilities of op shop discoveries, all containing previous histories and meanings." - Fran Allison

(www.quoil.co.nz/artists/fran_allison/)

Basically what she is saying is their work involves experimenting with found materials, domestic materials and these can be developed and re-worked, the reading or meaning of an object originally can be changed or continued in an artwork.

In her lecture she talked about this work or one very similar:

Ceremonial Daisy Chain

which is made from doilies, she talked about how she bought them from an op shop because she liked how they had previous lives. They used to belong to someone and they served a certain purpose but when she creates work out of them she is continuing their story and she can control the reading of the work she makes.

photo:(www.masterworksgallery.com/index.cfm?action=artists&page=work&artist_id=86&work_id=510)

Her individual work is inspired by ideas of found or discarded objects, of re-formatting and past histories. She likes to use pre-existing objects and mess with their original reading, they may start out as having a physical or decorative function and end up on the body as decorative fashion or jewellery objects but keep their original appeal about them.

photo:(www.fingers.co.nz/exhibitors/Allison_weeds_05.htm)

September 14th - Deborah Crowe

This week Deborah Crowe talked to us about her art practice. What I found most repetitive in her work was her exploration of space and containment, and construction and architecture. I especially liked her work with the human body's relationship to space, though you can also tell she incorporates ideas of containing the body and constructing objects for the body. One of the works she showed us really stood out to me, it was Aldina which were corsets constructed out of different materials. It spoke about feminism and politics, the 'correct' image projected by society and women distorting their bodies to suit it. Deborah stated that it also spoke about torture which she was interested in as a theme to explore.

In a work she collaborated with Kim Fraser on, Dual Outlook (1997), it really travels away from the 'norm.' I like how it is so out there, its very strong in using aesthetic and expressive effects. You can see from the top part of the body structure that she has worked with architectural elements like grids. Again this is very much a structure about containing the body and the space the body inhabits.

Collared (1999) is very fashion based, it really brings across her exploration with materials and how she never restricts herself to just one medium.

Caroline Broadhead's Neckpiece Veil circa 1986 relates really well to Deborah's work. It is very similar in its containment properties and I think the shadows that are created inside really add to the work, they're like a projection against the object of a human body. It is a very closed space and speaks of the human body wanting to have freedom of movement and not being able to.

A really great work by an artist that Deborah showed us that relates to space was Open Wide (2009) by Clare Barclay. Barclay has described these structures in terms of a physical manifestation of imaginary spaces (www.doggerfisher.com/artists/artistdetail.php?id=46).

These 'unfinished' rooms contain echoes of recognisable lifestyles and environments. They have a nostalgic element to them which allows the viewer to connect with the space.

My favourite work by Deborah had to be Shig because of the use of space, the viewer's experience with it and the effect of shadows.

To be honest, with this work, I'm more interested in the visual than the meaning. I like how it looks eerie and haunting, the ghostly suspension of the objects. It also has a kind of cluttered feel to it, I imagine it would be very interesting to move around in and in that respect I believe Deborah was spot on about art being better seen in reality than in photographs.

August 24th - Steve Lovett

This week I actually missed the beginning of the lecture so during it I was a bit confused about what his practice focused on, so my understanding is this:

Steve's practice is a lot about documenting life and he draws from his own surroundings and personal experiences. In his work Holding the Man (1996), from a show where he examined small resilient gestures in the HIV crisis, you get a sense of this autobiographical element to his work. This one in particular relates to the major loss he suffered due to HIV being predominant among his friends. So his work really focuses on his life and his thoughts and feelings about social, political and historical issues.

Build It Up Tear It Down (1995-2002) is a screen print made by Steve to deflect some of his anger at the fact that in the 90's politicians in Wellington were seriously suggesting that artists work for free 'because it was there passion.' He describes the work as a game for idle hands; it explores the idea that things are broken up and run down, not so they are destroyed but so that they don't work as they once did (a point made by Ivan Kilma in his book Waiting to Breathe).

Bambi/Darren (1997-2009) is a great social work, it is part of a larger body and features a man named Darren (on the right) and his alter ego Bambi (on the left). He worked with different pairs of people to produce composite images; each of the images said different things about the subjects in the work, it spoke about the subtleties of a relationship between two people whether they are very close or not.

Identity is so strong in Steve's work, he approaches it in such unique ways too. For example his installations involving voice recordings, it adds a sense of being overwhelmed by identity and all the issues people have with themselves. It's like in Darren/Bambi, why an alter ego? Is it to escape aspects of himself or to immerse himself in hidden aspects he wants to show? There is a juxtaposition of presence and absence, a boundary between the intimate and the private being crossed.

There is a nice progression from focus on social and political issues to focus on form and colour. Intersection (2007) looks at a single location at different times in a week. It helps you see all the different forms in a space, how people interact with each other. He expressed in the lecture his fascination with the ways people organise themselves in relation to others and perhaps this work can relate to those thoughts.

I really like Trespass (2005) because its very similar to Intersection in that it is one place over 16 hours, but it shows a great sequence of a blue colour palette. The colour of this work is very strong, it's the first thing you see and it actually takes you awhile to realise it's made from so many photographs.

(Photos from emit)

August 17th - Frances Hansen

This week Frances Hansen talked to us about her practice and I was really looking forward to seeing some of her drawings as she taught our class for life drawing, but the work she showed us was a bit different. As she said in the lecture, her work reflects what goes on in her environment. So because of her young children she spent a lot of her time shopping in supermarkets or cleaning her home with different kinds of cleaning products. Part of her process includes collecting so her art work strongly shows her noticing, photographing and compiling objects or images in relation to this sense of normality. Then she moves on to constructing and how she is going to compose her work, looking at her artwork you can tell she really thinks about arrangement and layering and scale. What I liked about her work involving these kind of domestic household products was how she silhouetted them in her painting, when viewing the work you get this feeling of familiarity but you have to think to discover exactly what the objects are. In a way this links to the idea that as consumers we don't realise how much product and advertising we are exposed to so we actually tune it out without realising, so its quite surprising that we have to really think to remember what this silhouette represents. This actually brings me to another part of her process which is thinking or reflecting; this is really about the reading of the work, the why? What? And how? of it, investigating the concept behind the visual. The environment she has found herself in, what is considered the norm, domesticity, is a big influence. She uses a lot of 50's and 60's aesthetics and she'll take photos of any small patterns or examples of this whenever she can, the reason for this is because the face of domesticity is a 50's housewife. I guess you could say that she confronts the domestic heritage of New Zealand with detailed imagery of interior spaces. Because of the products, the packaging, the waste, she also reflected on environmentalism. It's shocking how much packaging a mother of young kids can go through, so again she collected.

A really great example of art using packaging waste is Gush by Eve Armstrong, Hansen talked about how she is influenced by her and I understand this because though some people might say the work is just a pile of rubbish I think it is a very visually pleasing pile of rubbish with its layers and composition.

This is a great work to look at in regards to Hansen's practice as it can be read in different ways, one aspect could be about waste and materials and the materialistic lifestyle we live, another could focus on how hazardous a lifestyle we live like global warming as a big issue. But also if you're thinking about Hansen's work relating to her home life you could look at this work and think one persons pile of garbage is another child's playground.




While Hansen's work is very much about process: collecting, constructing, thinking and changing it is also very much about development of ideas and her influences. Her art may sometimes look quite basic but that is deceptive, you really have to look to see the layers of ideas she addresses. But what I really like about her work is that familiarity, that sense that you know what she is trying to portray through her work because you have lived it, it is about our culture and lifestyle.

August 10th - Eldon Booth

This week Eldon Booth spoke to us about his art practice in moving image, I actually took part in the 48 hour film festival last year so I knew this would be a very interesting subject to learn about but I quickly realised that I would need a lot of my media studies knowledge as well to understand and discuss this medium. Booth's work seems to address the human condition and social concerns in NZ communities within the wider context of Western culture. He deals with concepts of realism, the difference between reality and illusion, and the film techniques used to portray it. There are certain elements used in film to create the illusion of realism, three rather important things that must be used were realised by an academic, novelist and critic named Raymond Williams: a contemporary setting is obviously applied, action is described in human terms (this can relate back to the human condition), and it must be socially extended, meaning it deals with the lives of ordinary people. This actually relates to an essay, "Realism and Convention," by Marion Jordan where she analyses the soap opera "Coronation Street" in regards to realism and the film techniques used to create a continuation drama. Like Raymond Williams she talks about the characters and setting being realistic, working class unlike the characters in shows like 'Friends' where they always get into crazy situations or live in great apartments that realistically would probably cost them a fortune to live in. Its tone is that of "social realism," the show chronicles the lives of a working class community, all of whom live on the same street (hence the title) and frequent the same pub. To me soap operas are most realistic in their longevity, its a relation to real life's continuation, and Jordan argues that "it is through the organization of the passage of time, the relation between character and narrative and, finally, the use of gossip that the continuous serial is both able to 'run for years' and 'preserve a basic stability while making enough changes to prevent tedious repetition' (Richard Dyer et al. 1981: 9)" (Soap Opera by Dorothy Hobson, page 23). Basically these shows try to be realistic but go as close to the edge of fabrication as they can, creating barely believable events.

Some very useful terms Booth talked about were transparency and reflection in connection to documentary or recorded reality and docu-drama, a dramatization of reality. What he means by transparency is that the camera creates a window, anybody who watches TV or films has an understanding of what places look like even though they have never even been there because of a transparent window to the world through the camera. In this case naturalistic film techniques would be used like natural lighting and sound. Reflection is all about creating a constructed reality. In a docu-drama the reality is obtained from the illusion of realism, a really amazing example that Booth showed us was a special episode of 'ER' called 'Ambush' (1997). The whole episode was filmed live like a play, with the whole cast having memorized their dialogue and blocking. The illusion of reality had many faces: it was filmed with handheld cameras, the cast would talk about the camera and look into the lens, characters would get in the camera mans way, or vice versa, sometimes the focus blurred, and sometimes the camera movements became erratic as if the camera man got an adrenaline rush in the midst of the action. From these examples it sounds like a low budget, amateur documentary which I think is the point, if the camera man kept perfectly cool in an emergency room no one would believe it was even remotely real, or if the characters acted indifferent about the camera it would seem like any other episode.
These same camera techniques were used in Booth's film 'Withdrawal' (2001), unlike his work 'Five Good Reasons' which technically focused more on dialogue, this film was very much about the filming and editing process. The use of filming with hand held cameras is something the viewer associates with real life, in fact Booth said in class "we tried to use the worst cameras we could find to help with this concept," and the use of natural light and sound encourages the fabrication of reality. The synopsis of the film is an ailing elderly man is forced to sell his farm to pay for his own medical care, at the same time the life of his grandson is documented. The footage for the film was shot over a two year period which links back to this idea of continuation drama, it chronicles the deterioration of the grandfather. The film is presented as a split screen and puts the grandfathers medical drug use next to the grandsons drug use, we can find meaning through this use of juxtaposition, this kind of linkage the different types of deterioration have to each other (one willing, one without choice). The camera shots are bonded to realism as the film is shot in a way that you would expect someone would do for some family event, nothing serious. For example the film features a lot of establish shots, shots of long duration, they are a bit shaky but this is all actually intentional. This film was a great example of realism in film, I liked how it was filmed amateur style, it made you very aware of the editing and film making process and the fine line between reality and illusion.

3rd August - Dion Hitchens

This week Dion Hitchens spoke to us about his work involving interaction and kinetic technology. Hitchens says his art isn't art without an audience, I think it is this relationship between the work and audience that inspires and interests him. In order to create a close relationship between the two his work has to engage the audience physically, so he doesn't just take into account the appearance of the work but also its site and placement. A great example of placement comes from one of his works of large woven sculptures made from weeping willows. The name of the work means the God of the forest and the work addresses the irony of this plant being an ecological hazard in New Zealand, its history of being used to mark land for farmers and saying can he be god of a colonized tree?

The objects are placed in a doorway and it is here where the audience is confronted by the work, they are engaged by it and therefore are forced to move around it. Also the objects are larger than the human body and so are rather imposing, this kind of relates to the god-like symbolism.

Some of his larger scale work is also interactive but in a less confrontational way, the sculptures take up space but as a viewer you can choose to move through it or around it, its much more free than his gallery work though its still sharing. This idea of choosing to interact is actually present in one of his works called Seek where figures made from bronze and copper stand on a perplex base and the audience is allowed to move them around.

Hitchens' work with kinetic sculpture is where I can see the joy in creating interactive art. After he told us about his artwork of ghost-like figures all made from one 3m long Totara log I became very interested. The figures in the room are very eerie and their stillness really adds to that. So because the viewer truly doesn't expect any of them to move they scream and jump pretty high when one of them suddenly does a dance-like movement after its motion sensor has been triggered. He told us about how once somebody got such a large fright they actually knocked over one of the other figures. Hitchens said he didn't mind repairing it and I understand that, its a fair enough price to pay when you get such a great reaction from an audience member and that's really what the work is their to achieve; its the best interactive experience a maker could hope for.

Another really good example of his work with motion sensors is his piece entitled: From Iron Bird which to me looks like a giant white porcelain American football though it more appropriately resembles an egg. Once the motion sensors are triggered by someone the work starts to rock like a pendulum and a tapping sound begins from inside like something is trying to hatch from it. Again my imagination jumps to a baby dinosaur considering the scale of the object, an idea which according to Hitchens apparently seriously frightened a young boy. The title of the piece however relates directly to what Hitchens said about placing the work in a site where the trees can be like power poles or the birds can be like aeroplanes, and this brings in humor to the work by joking that it is an egg laid by a plane.

Hitchens' work seems to incorporate a lot of humour, it can be in the context of the work but its most obvious in these uses of kinetic technology, his work really creates a close relationship to its audience and inspires strong reactions. The reactions his work gets makes his art extremely effective, and its not just appealing to people who can relate to the concepts he addresses because they physically engage you. I have never really been interested in sculpture of any kind and I most likely wouldn't prefer to work in this field but I now find it very interesting, especially kinetic sculpture because the reactions it can make are much larger or much more intense than a lot of other mediums.

27th July - Rebecca Hobbs

This week we went to see Rebecca Ann Hobbs' show Failing, Falling, Flying and without knowing all the works' true context I really didn't understand what it was about. From the title and most of the images I drew the conclusion that the main subject being explored, though not the only one, was about being caught in mid-motion in an unusual place or situation to be brief. All the works were from different periods of time and from individual series, and after Hobbs' talked to us about her work I understood a lot of humour and absurdity had been injected. This concept of absurdity is a very large part of the show and is a reflection on Hobbs' past experiences and personality. She explained her works as stylized jokes, even dirty jokes, causing the viewer to look twice when seeing images that aren't the norm like the upside-down image Over Easy (2006). Her photograph Complex Social Groups (2001) is a self-portrait of her standing with a dog and it is a joke about beastiality, this is a good example of her work with dirty jokes and it is a good example of something that gathers attention as it was part of her series Suck Roar which was what made her name known. Her photos also freeze movement, showing us a living thing mid-falling, flying or failing which looks very surreal and awkward. In a way her images are literal translations of the word absurd, even the titles like Spin (which matches an image of a man falling down a flight of stairs) can be literal. Spin (2006) also shows one of the scenarios in her works where the casual and dangerous mix which is a very strange situation.
It is easy to believe that absurdity in art is the result of anxiety we feel when we face absurdity in our lives, Hobbs mentioned that she didn't do well in school, she cut class, always got detention, moved to a lot of different schools etc. and this has influenced her work and is probably what interested her in this idea of the absurd perspective of the world. What I found most interesting when researching absurd art, and Hobbs talked about it also, was how the absurdity is on some level about peoples drive to find meaning in the world and not being able to. In an essay by the philosopher Camus, he introduces his philosophy of the absurd: "man's futile search for meaning, unity and clarity in the face of an unintelligible world devoid of God and eternal truths or values." Both Hobbs and Camus compared the absurdity of man's life with the situation of Sisyphus, a figure of Greek mythology who was condemned to forever repeat the same meaningless task of pushing a boulder up a mountain only to see it roll down again. "The workman of today works everyday in his life at the same tasks, and this fate is no less absurd. But it is tragic only at the rare moments when it becomes conscious". Camus presents Sisyphus' situation as a metaphor for modern lives spent working at hopeless jobs in factories and offices. Basically the hopeless moment is when he is walking down the hill, realising the futility of his task but when he realizes the absurdity of his situation you have to imagine him being content and in acceptance of his life when he is striving for his goal, he keeps pushing.

20th July - Mary Curtis

Mary Curtis' art practice shows a strong relationship between function and decoration, an "everyday" quality and a museum-like quality. In a way jewellery loses its usability by becoming an object in a gallery, it becomes all about how it is displayed, what it looks like, rather than how it would or should function. Her work Ostentatious is a great example of her play on the lack of functionality jewellery can have, the work was designed specifically for a showcase in the Auckland contemporary jewellery store, Fingers. Ostentatious is a long red velvet ring box that runs along two walls on the ground, made so it would stand out from other glass encased artworks. Each depression holds a silver finger-ring and the fragility or size of which make the work appear somewhat ridiculous and impractical to wear, this is the difference between function and decoration. Decoration is not only about how the object looks but also the way it is presented, Curtis expressed her disdain at enclosing her work in a vitrine because it would completely change the language of the artwork, so she made it in a way that requires our attention. Entitling the work Ostentatious also emphasises this concept of exhibition and display and this work being intended for show.

Curtis is particularly interested in the history of decoration which is where we can see the usability of jewellery more clearly. For example, 19th century jewellery was very much about showing off, it was big and looked highly uncomfortable to wear. But this is where the difference between function and display is defined because though they are so flashy they actually functioned as a display of wealth. But also jewellery can be culturally symbolic like Hawaiian wreaths which have meaning as a welcoming and a parting.
Symbolism of work is actually very interesting to look at, what I liked from Curtis' work was her red heart-shaped fish hook necklace. It is a simple design but its meanings can be limitless; it could symbolize love, anger, good luck as red is in some cultures, is love a painful catch? Does it hurt falling in love?

Metadecorative: New work by Mary Curtis is an exhibition consisting of brooches, rings, earrings, and necklaces made from such materials as silver, wallpaper, wool blankets, recycled fabric, paint, cotton, stainless wire, glue and resin. These materials inspire an "everyday" quality in the work, coupled with a museum-like atmosphere. These works evidence her interest in decoration within usable objects; they appear in a way that resembles jewellery from the 19th century, the patterns are similar, the colour palette, the only difference would be that they are made from cheaper materials and found objects. The line between function and decoration is faint in these works as they are visually unusual and therefore unlikely to be worn, though the point that making isn't always about being pretty was brought up by Curtis, they are in fact sizable to be worn. I do think that being worn would change the reading of the work, they would become personal to the wearer and depending on the person doing the wearing they would look different to how they would look in a vitrine which is where this museum-like quality in the work comes from.
I think the pieces are more effective in these closed off spaces, they becomes individuals in a collection and therefore each require our attention from all angles. It also emphasises this link to history, its like seeing part of a world we didn't live in but having the knowledge that they were inspired not only by the past but also by modern influences.